PART THREE
THE TRIAL OF JUAN DE VERGARA
* AHN, Inquisicion de Toledo, Legajo 223, no. 42, Proceso contra Juan de Vergara. This document consists of 387 numbered folios, followed by 38 unnumbered folios, all of it arranged haphazardly, without regard to chronology. It has been summarized elsewhere, from differing perspectives, by Marcel Bataillon, Erasmo y Espana, Mexico, 1950, vol. 2, pp. 13-52, and by Manuel Serrano y Sanz, "Juan de Vergara y la inquisicion de Toledo," in Revista de Archivos, Bibliotecas y Museos, V (1901), pp. 896-912, and VI (1902), pp. 29-42, 466-486. |
Chapter One (Note: Quotations from the manuscript are in italics) July, 1530 - December, 1530 (58r-70v; 7r-8v) Toledo, July 27, 1530 Francisca Hernandez said that ... many times she heard Bernardino de Tovar, in conversation with her and other persons, say that he took no care to pray at all and that he regularly said mass without praying, claiming it was not necessary to pray and he thought nothing of it. This witness told him that was wrong, that he should not do such things and that he ought to pray, and that if he did not, this witness would not listen to his masses. Despite the fact that she always told him this, Tovar persisted in his opinion and was very aggravated with her for rebuking him, and this witness never saw Tovar pray. |
144 JOHN E. LONGHURST times, citing as authority the evangel where it says (Matthew, 5:28) "Whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. " Despite this, Tovar persisted in his opinion. |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 145 Asked if she remembers that the said Doctor Vergara uttered any particular propositions and opinions of Luther or of his brother Tovar .., she said that he held the same opinions as his brother Bernardino de Tovar in the matter of bulls and indulgences of our holy father, mocking them just as does his brother. There were read to her one by one the condemned propositions held by the dejados and alumbrados (i.e., Illuminists) and she declared as follows. (1) 4. That God entered into a man's soul more fully than He appeared in the Host, if the man behaved as he should, because the Host was a small amount of flour, whereas man was created in God's likeness. In regard to this fourth proposition, she said she knows that Bernardino de Tovar held this to be certain and true, because she heard him say it many times, saying that God entered more perfectly and fully into a man's soul than He did into the Host. This witness often rebuked him for this, but he always persisted in his opinion. 7. He referred to those who wept over their sins as penance seekers, wrapped up in themselves, and as crybabies ("lloraduelos"). 1. In their questioning of a cooperative witness like Francisca Hernandez the inquisitors did not hesitate to prompt her by reading to her the propositions condemned in the edict of 1525 against the Illuminists. Her replies were then included in the charges against Vergara in such a way as to indicate that they were spontaneous denunciations by the witness. Vergara, in his lengthy defense of March 6, 1534, was not fooled by this device, and pointed out that Francisca had been prompted in just this way by her questioners. Inserted in the text above are the propositions from the original edict to which, according to Francisca Hernandez, Tovar and/or Vergara subscribed. |
146 JOHN E. LONGHURST In regard to the seventh proposition, she said she heard Tovar speak of those who wept for their sins as crybabies, making (un of them and saying that God wanted none of that, but only good intentions. 8. That confession is not of divine, but of positive law. In regard to the eighth proposition, she said she knows that Tovar maintained that confession was not of divine law, but of positive law, because she heard him say so and this witness rebuked him for it. 9. That the Love of God in man is God. In regard to the ninth proposition, she said she heard Tovar say that he who loves God is God and he maintained that God is charity, etc., and this witness rebuked him for it. 13. That the exterior acts of prayer serve no purpose and are not necessary and that to perform them is imperfection ... and that when speaking of exterior works a certain person said that it was all the same to him whether he said mass or did not say mass, whether he prayed or did not pray. In regard to the thirteenth proposition, she said that Tovar said the exterior acts of prayer serve no purpose and are not necessary and that to perform them is imperfection. It seems to her that he also said it mattered little to him whether he said mass or did not say mass, whether he prayed or did not pray... and she rebuked him (or this. 28. That there was no need of bulls. In regard to the twenty-eighth proposition, she said she has already declared how Tovar and his brother Doctor Vergara mocked and joked about bulls and indulgences. |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 147 Asked if she heard Tovar say any things other than what she has declared, she replied that it seems to her Bernardino de Tovar doubted there was a Purgatory, and this witness rebuked him for all these things. |
148 JOHN E. LONGHURST Toledo, August 16, 1530 She recalls that Bernardino de Tovar used to say that ceremonies connected with mass were superfluous, that consecration alone was sufficient, and that the latter could be performed while people were seated or in any position whatever, and that the other ceremonies were gimmicks of the friars ("cosas frailescas "). This witness rebuked him severely and scolded him, telling him that all those ceremonies were ordained by the Holy Spirit and were in remembrance of the Passion of our lord Jesus Christ ... but Bernardino de Tovar, despite her rebukes, snapped his fingers and remained in his opinion. Toledo, September 22, 1530 Francisca Hernandez, beata, prisoner in the jail of this Holy Office ... said that about four years ago, in Valladolid, she was talking with Miguel de Eguia, the printer of Alcala, about the Illuminists. Miguel de Eguia praised them greatly, saying that not without reason were |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 149 they called Illuminists, because they were illuminated in order to serve God, and those who persecuted them were not Christians. He also said ... he would give his soul and property and all he had for them. Among the many other erroneous things which this witness heard him say was that there was no Purgatory. When this witness rebuked him, Miguel de Eguia replied, "Say whatever you wish; the whole world won't change my opinion." He also expressed doubt that there was a Hell. This Miguel de Eguia used to confess to Tovar. (She said) Miguel de Eguia greatly praised the clerics Juan Lopez (de Calain) Diego Lopez (Husillo) and Tovar, and she heard both Eguia and Juan Lopez say that Luther was a great servant of God. She also heard all three of them say that they wanted to form (a group of) twelve apostles and go out to convert the whole world to their views and to tell how everything else was superstition and a joke. She also heard Miguel de Eguia say papal bulls were worthless. Toledo, September 24, 1530 Inquisitor (Pedro) Vaguer told her that (since) she has said that (Gaspar del Villafana is a heretic and Juan Lopez (de Calain) and |
150 JOHN E. LONGHURST Diego Lopez (Husillo) are likewise heretics, that she now state what she knows about them. She replied that Villafana never spoke with her except on one occasion, when he brought her a letter from Bernardino de Tovar in which Tovar recommended Villafana very highly, saying that he was a very saintly person and a man of great promise. |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 151 Castillo also wanted to be an apostle; he was very fond of Tovar and Juan Lopez and Diego Lopez and went around with them. She knows that he (Castillo) gave Diego Lopez a mule and some money in order to come and go with messages to Tovar. And she knows that the merchant Castillo is an Illuminist and holds all the opinions of the Illuminists. 2. This is in direct contradiction of the statement of Olivares himself. Testifying in Pastrana on February 16, 1525, when he was still an admitted admirer of Francisca Hernandez, Olivares said he was sent to Francisca in Valladolid on the urging of Francisco Ortiz, and dated his visit to her as "sixteen months before" (i.e., late 1523). Universitaets Bibliothek (Halle, Germany), vol. II, Yc20, 2, 2, Proceso contra Francisco Ortiz, fols. 42r-v. |
152 JOHN E. LONGHURST harm and can implant (false doctrine) in people with whom he communicates, because he knows well how to implant what he wishes in the minds of people with whom he speaks. She knows this from the letters written to her by Tovar and by his young sister (Isabel de Vergara) who lives with him. The sister wrote this witness letters which showed that she was lost in these Illuminist doctrines and this witness knows that both Tovar and his sister regularly wrote, to many clerics, letters which were full of Illuminist doctrines and which were very harmful. Toledo, October 12, 1530 Asked about the first article, where she says she heard Tovar say it was not necessary to confess one's bad thoughts, if Tovar spoke of voluntary bad thoughts or involuntary ones, she replied that what |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 153 Tovar said was that no thoughts - voluntary or otherwise - needed to be confessed, and therefore this witness told Tovar she knew well enough she was not obligated to confess involuntary thoughts. Not only this, but Tovar said that confession (itself) was not necessary, that contrition was sufficient because, he said, confession was not of divine law. She also said she knows that in all the time Tovar conversed with her before he was ordained as a priest, although she knew that he used to say mass in his quarters, she never knew nor heard that he made confession. 3. "Para hombre que esta en el cielo, es mucho." |
154 JOHN E. LONGHURST she does not recall the details, but she heard him say it many times, and the reason Tovar gave for saying this was that the end is more important than the means, and the sacrament (of communion) was the means, while the spirit was the end ... and she often heard him say that after a man had received the holy sacrament he could not be worshipped any more or any less than the custos where the sacrament is. She also heard him say this whenever he spoke about the worshipping of images, claiming that such worship meant nothing. She was asked about the fourth article where she says she heard Tovar say that excommunication was not binding.... She replied that many times when Tovar was talking with her about excommunication, she heard him say that excommunication is to separate one from God and nobody had the power to separate anybody from God. |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 155 She said she remembers that Tovar sent some clerics to her, and she knows that when they came to her, (the custom of) not praying was already embedded in them. Asked who these clerics were, she replied that one Hernando Mohedano was a companion of Tovar in Valladolid and Tovar used to send him to her for her to talk with him, and she knows that this (Mohedano) often said mass without praying. |
156 JOHN E. LONGHURST de Cazalla, Tovar, Villareal, (Rodrigo de) Cueto and this witness. The inquisitors had forbidden Medrano to talk with her, although he did say mass for her and she prepared his meals for him. So on that day, and on other occasions too, Medrano came to the door and said to Bishop Cazalla, "Make my daughter eat for me, your reverence. " The bishop, laughing, replied, "Don't think of coming in; you would do well to fear censure and excommunication. " Then Tovar, laughing and mocking, said, "I'm glad to see that your reverence appreciates the comedy in these censures, "and he spoke at length, making fun of censures, saying they were not binding and there was no need to observe them, the two of them (Tovar and Bishop Cazalla) speaking very openly and without restraint on the subject. Asked about the second statement... in which she says Miguel de Eguia greatly praised the Illuminists, let her state and declare which persons he praised as Illuminists. She replied that the persons praised by Miguel de Eguia were the clerics Diego Lopez (Husillo) and Juan Lopez (de Calain) and Tovar, whom Eguia described as the captain whom he esteemed above all the rest, and (Diego del) Castillo from Burgos. He also praised Isabel de La Cruz and Pedro Ruiz de Alcaraz. Toledo, October 13, 1530 Asked ... what Miguel de Eguia was discussing when he said there was no Purgatory, and how long ago this happened, and where, she |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 157 replied that she recalls clearly that this discussion with Miguel de Eguia took place in Valladolid in the home of Pedro de Cazalla.... Eguia had just come from Medina de Rioseco and he was telling this witness how they were getting along with their plans to form twelve apostles. In the course of this conversation, while he was praising Diego Lopez and Juan Lopez and Tovar on point after point, he came to the subject of Purgatory and spoke the words to which this witness has testified, strongly affirming this point of view (on Purgatory). He also said many other erroneous things which this witness does not remember clearly. |
158 JOHN E. LONGHURST were working to form that apostolate and that their plans were common knowledge. Asked what persons should know about this, she replied that maestro (Juan del) Castillo knows about it, for he wanted to be one of them, as did Miguel de Eguia; and she believes Alonso (Perez de) Bivero could know about it because Diego Lopez stayed in Bivero's house (in Valladolid). Others who know about it are dona Juana de Baeza and dona Francisca (de Zuniga), wife of Antonio de Baeza; also dona Mencia (de Baeza), who is a nun and sister of dona Juana (de Baeza), and the conde de Ribadeo, because she believes Juan Lopez stayed in the same house. (4) Asked how she knows that they could know this, she replied because she heard Juan Lopez and Diego Lopez talk about it, and she also heard dona Juana and dona Mencia speak of it. She believes dona Francisca knows about it because she wrote to this witness about how scandalous she thought (Juan and Diego Lopez) were. 4. "Y el conde de Ribadeo porque poso cree que en la misma casa Juan Lopez." It is not clear just who stayed in whose house with whom. |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 159 Toledo, October 17, 1530 Asked if Doctor Vergara and Tovar, and the other persons she has named .., said to her the things she has said they said, with the object of inducing her or attracting her to these errors she has mentioned and to their own opinions, advising her to hold and accept these same opinions, or if she heard them express these opinions in discussion with other persons, she said that all the things which they said were said to induce her to accept their opinions, and she knows that if she had been willing to hold to the same opinions as they did and to approve of the opinions she has mentioned, they would have held her in the highest esteem, but she spoke against their opinions and consequently they were not on good terms with her. |
160 JOHN E. LONGHURST Toledo, December 2, 1530 Among certain questions which were asked in Toledo of Francisca Hernandez on December 2, 1530, by licentiate Hernando Nino of the Council of the Holy General Inquisition and the inquisitors Mejia and Vaguer, is a question, number eight, as follows. 5. Francisca here reverses her earlier account on this point, a fact which does not escape her questioners. |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 161 She replied that she has just now stated that the persons Tovar sent to her so that she might indoctrinate them - that this is incorrectly written, because the truth of the matter is that Tovar sent them to her in order for them to teach her, which is why Tovar, in his letters, dared not say anything more than that somebody had good ability. 6. "Aunque fuera diez mas que ella." |
162 JOHN E. LONGHURST (Ortiz) what opinions were held by these persons who used to come to talk with her, because until this witness told him these things, friar Francisco considered these persons to be servants of God. Francisca and Ortiz say is true, Francisca's motives were almost
certainly other than is implied here; most likely she did not want competition,
and Alcaraz was hardly the type she could dominate. On the other hand, she could
be lying. As for Ortiz, he probably would not lie, but he seems to have been able
to believe only what Francisca told him. |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 163 if she has had any disagreements or been annoyed with any of them, which might have led to such enmity or hatred. Toledo, December 4, 1530 Francisca Hernandez ... was asked by licentiate Nino if she has remembered anything she should say... in addition to what she has already stated and deposed. She said she does not remember anything in particular in addition to what she has already stated, although ... to clear her conscience she states that she saw nothing that appeared to her to be Christian in Tovar nor in Diego Lopez (Husillo) and Juan Lopez (de Calain). 9. Francisca claims she had refused even to receive letters from
Tovar, much less read them. Yet she must have read this one at least. |
164 JOHN E. LONGHURST Asked about the fifteenth question ... she replied that she has not had nor does she ( now) have hatred nor enmity nor any rancor at all toward any of the persons against whom she has deposed. Rather, she loves them as she loves her own mother and she would die for each of them as (she would) for the salvation of her soul, and with the help of Jesus Christ she is very much disposed to this end. What she has said has been said to unburden her conscience and because they (the Inquisitors) told her she was obligated to do so under pain of excommunication ... and she said further ... that between herself and the persons about whom she has testified there has never occurred any disagreement or dispute which could have prompted this witness to wish them ill nor to feel hatred or enmity toward them, because although she knows that Diego Lopez and Tovar spoke badly about her, she still has not wished nor does she now wish them ill. August, 1530 - December, 1530 (76r-79v; 9r-10r) Toledo, August 3, 1530 She said she remembers hearing Doctor Vergara, in some conversations with her mistress Francisca Hernandez, say that oral prayer was not necessary and that what was the point in saying an Ave Maria to a saint, for that was just breaking one's head; that the (inner) thought was sufficient for drawing near to God. Francisca Hernandez rebuked him and told him that was not a proper opinion, rather that it was good to pray orally, but Doctor Vergara persisted in his opinion.... Pedro de Cazalla, citizen of Valladolid, was present (at these conversations) and he used to say that what Vergara held and believed in this matter was good, and he approved it, saying what good were these Pater Nosters. Asked if she remembers who else was present at these conversations ... she replied that she recalls that one of those present was friar Gil (Lopez de Bejar), preacher, and a companion whose name was Valenzuela, and some other friars whose names she does not recall, except that one of them was a preacher. (11) 11. That is, friar Moreno. |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 165 She also said she heard Doctor Vergara greatly praise Luther and his teachings and say that he carried with him some of Luther's writings, and she particularly heard him say that what Luther said about the bulls granted by our very holy father to faithful Christians, both alive and dead, was that Luther spoke truly when he said it was a joke. In saying this Vergara laughed a great deal, showing what a joke he thought it was and how it was a lot of (hot) air what the pope granted. She also heard him say that except for his rejection of confession, all of Luther's opinions seemed very good to him. Present at this conversation were Pedro de Cazalla and others whose names this witness does not recall at present.... Francisca Hernandez rebuked Doctor Vergara for all the above because she was very much opposed to those who held such opinions, referring to such persons as "pasmados. " Despite her rebukes Doctor Vergara remained in his opinion. All this happened six years ago or more. 12. One of these sons was Agustin de Cazalla, who was burned at
the stake in Valladolid as a Lutheran in 1559. |
166 JOHN E. LONGHURST 1Toledo, August 17, 1530 She heard Doctor Vergara say that among the other good ideas held by Martin Luther was that of saying mass after eating. When Francisca Hernandez rebuked him for this Doctor Vergara said that ... our Lord had consecrated after eating. He also said that except for the consecration, none of the ceremonies of the mass were necessary. Toledo, September 22, 1530 She said that about four years ago when she was in Valladolid, in company with Francisca Hernandez, Miguel de Eguia ... came to Valladolid to talk with Francisca. In their conversation she heard Eguia praise the opinions of the Illuminists, saying that they were properly called Illuminists because they were illuminated by God to serve Him, and those who did not follow them were not Christians, and that he would stand up for them even if his life and property depended on it. |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 167 Miguel de Eguia replied, "You believe what you like; this is what I believe." He also told her he did not believe there was a Hell although he would not, he said, repeat this to others, but he believed it himself. This witness believes Tovar taught him this latter ( error), because when Eguia had come on previous occasions to talk with Francisca Hernandez he had not held those errors - not until after he had spoken with Tovar. But after speaking with Tovar she saw how he came to hold these errors. When Hernando Nino, member of the Council of the General Inquisition, came to Toledo to ask further questions of Francisca Hernandez, in an effort to clarify some points in her testimonies, he also questioned Maria Ramirez for the same reason. The striking similarities between the testimony of Francisca and her maid Maria, who were sharing the same cell, convinced Nino that the. two ladies were regularly comparing notes. Nino accordingly asked Maria Ramirez some pointed - and rather obvious - questions. |
168 JOHN E. LONGHURST Toledo, December 2, 1530 She was asked if before she entered this jail to be in the company of Francisca Hernandez, her mistress, she had communicated with any people, saying to them, "I saw so and so do or say such and such," and who were the persons with whom she so communicated. |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 169 because they came on recommendation from Tovar. Asked if she recalls the names of some of these clerics, she replied that she recalls only one (Juan del) Castillo and Santo Domingo, citizens of Toledo. 14. The well-documented predatory habits of Francisca Hernandez make this a barefaced lie. |
170 JOHN E. LONGHURST search of persons in order to have them prepared for the time when Tovar would come (to lead them). She knows that maestro (Juan del) Castillo also went to Medina de Rioseco to be an apostle, where they had Miguel de Eguia in hiding in order to make him one of the apostles, and his (Eguia's) brothers were looking for him but could not find him. (15) It was common knowledge that the Admiral (Fadrique EnrIquez of Castile) had them all there thinking they were very good persons, but after he saw that it was all a matter of the devil he threw them out. 15. "Eguia's brothers..." - including the future Jesuit, Diego
de Eguia (above, p. 106). |
171 LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN Asked if she knew that the above mentioned persons who came to Valladolid looked on Tovar as their teacher and leader, she replied that she knew this from the way they spoke, but afterward she spoke with Santo Domingo, who said that Tovar and his teachings could go to the devil. (12r-14r) Madrid, September 6, 1530 He said that about twenty or twenty five days or a month ago, more or less, when he was in this city of Madrid in the residence of (Alonso Fonseca), the archbishop of Toledo, and in his presence, they were discussing the Latin translations of Holy Scripture presently being made from Hebrew and Greek. This witness said he thought the translation presently being used by the holy mother Church was much better and more accurate and that he did not want another new translation; it would open the door to the suggestion that some things in the present edition are inaccurate and would allow anyone who took the notion, to maintain that the substantial points of Holy |
174 JOHN E. LONGHURST Scripture have not been properly translated and consequently hold them in little regard, which would be contrary to our holy faith. |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 173 he replied that he recalls nothing of this kind about Doctor Vergara. About a year ago, in Pinto, when he believes the (imperial) court was at Toledo, two German friars of the Franciscan order came through Pinto. While talking with the said friars about the Inquisition's imprisonment of friar Francisco Ortiz, (he noted) that they held to some of Luther's opinions. He does not recall just what these opinions were, except that these friars appeared upset whenever this witness called Luther a heretic. This witness does not recall the names of the said friars. This deposition of Bernardino de Flores was taken in Madrid by Hernando Nino of the Council of the General Inquisition. Flores' statement was then sent by the Council to the Toledo tribunal, with a letter dated September 17 (fol. 2r). In its letter, the Council advised the Toledo Inquisitors of the great need for following proper procedures in the Vergara case, and directed the Toledo Inquisitors to keep the Council informed of any new developments. "Do not be surprised at this," the letter continues, "It is necessary to do so because of the considerable clamor being raised here in regard to this affair, and it has been of great help in quieting everyone down to have seen this new report with its so highly reputable witnesses." The Council also sent along to Toledo five books which Vergara had delivered to the Council two weeks before, in response to an Inquisition edict ordering the surrender of all books by Luther and his followers. It also appeared that information about the proceedings in the trial of Tovar had been leaking out to unauthorized persons. "In due time," the Council promised, "we shall be ready to take steps to find out through whom, when and how this information is being leaked out." |
174 JOHN E. LONGHURST (11r-11v bis) Toledo, October 10, 1530 Friar Francisco Ortiz ... said that about six years ago Francisca Hernandez advised him to have no (further J communication with Tovar, brother of Doctor Vergara. This witness was greatly surprised at this because the said Tovar had spoken very well of her and had even sent the cleric from Toledo, (Fernando de J Santo Domingo, to confer with her for the edification of his spirit. (17) Later this witness learned from Francisca Hernandez that the said Tovar had adhered to the errors of his brother Vergara regarding bulls and oral prayer. This witness also remembered that one time when he was talking with Doctor Vergara in the college at Alcala, Vergara praised Erasmus as a person who thought nothing of not saying the Divine Office if one were studying something important. Later, this witness saw how the above mentioned Tovar was a mortal enemy and hostile critic of Francisca Hernandez, beata, without having seen her nor received a letter from her since (they broke off relations). 17. Francisco Ortiz, like Maria Ramirez, supports the first version of Francisca's story, namely that Tovar sent people to Francisca for the latter's instruction. It is apparent that Francisca did not have time to inform Ortiz of her new explanation of these events. Although Francisca and Ortiz were in separate cells, so disordered was the security system in the cell block that Francisca was able to make regular visits to Francisco Ortiz in his cell, and there is no doubt that Francisca Hernandez was coaching Ortiz as well as her maid Maria Ramirez. AHN, Inquisicion de Toledo, Legajo 110, no. 21, Proceso contra Maria de Cazallao See unnumbered folios (226r, 22 7r-v) at the end. |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 175 Dionisio in (the monastery of) San Agustin in Toledo, in which Erasmus expressed his great gratitude to Doctor Vergara for the favor he and Tovar and another brother of theirs - (Francisco de Vergara) the Greek ( scholar) - were doing for him. Later, this witness' own brother, Doctor (Pedro) Ortiz, told him that one time when he was talking with Vergara, the latter spoke badly about the doctors of (the University of) Paris, having little regard for them. (18) Vergara swore in the name of God that there was in his opinion no heresy of any kind against the Church in Erasmus. Doctor Ortiz replied to Vergara, "Well, I swear on your own oath that there is (such heresy in Erasmus), and I will show you the Church councils in which such heresy is condemned." Doctor Ortiz told his brother, the present witness, how wrong the said Doctor Vergara was, because he (Doctor Ortiz) showed him (Doctor Vergara) a book which Doctor Ortiz said was one of the most pernicious books in Christendom, to which Doctor Vergara replied that he had gone through it and he swore in God's name that the book contained no heresy at all, and this witness thinks that the idea that one should be free not to say the Divine Office for any reason is a very bad idea. 18. The Sorbonne faculty of the University of Paris condemned Erasmus in 1527. |
176 JOHN E. LONGHURST Asked if he spoke with Doctor Vergara or his brother Tovar on any other occasions, he said he spoke with Tovar another time in Burgos in the house of the archbishop of Toledo (Alonso Fonseca) but not on any disputed subject, and he does not remember having spoken with him any other times. He spoke with Tovar two or three times in Alcala, at which time Tovar spoke very well of Francisca Hernandez and told this witness he thought he (Ortiz) was very fortunate to go there (to Valladolid and Francisca) and that he fervently wished he might go to see her himself: and he gave this witness a letter for her, which letter, as this witness recalls, he heard Francisca read in Valladolid. (16r) Toledo, October 28, 1530 Hernando de Lunar ... said ... that about two or three years ago, more or less, this witness was talking with the prisoner, the cleric Bernardino de Tovar, in Alcala, about certain matters of Holy Scripture and o(' conscience. He saw and heard Tovar say that the practice o(' praying the canonical hours according to the breviary had been established ('or rogues because in former limes they did not pray but studied Holy Scripture continually. However, as time went on, the clergy began 10 be composed of shiftless rogues who did not want to study, so the Church ordered them to pray and not amuse themselves with something else. This witness gathered that Tovar held the opinion that prayer served no purpose except to keep the clergy occupied. |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 177 Toledo, November 4, 1530 He was asked if he has spoken with any person or persons about whether priests are obligated to say the Divine Office or whether sacramental confession is of divine or positive law, or about indulgences granted by the pope, or if he knows that the person or persons who spoke with him on these matters might have held to some errors regarding them. He replied that it may well be that on some occasions some people may have spoken with this witness regarding the said propositions, which he does not recall at present. However, he particularly remembers that a year ago this past Lenten season, or a little before, when he was talking with Doctor Vergara, the latter was trying to speak in favor of the cause of Erasmus, complaining that Erasmus' doctrines had been maltreated in Paris. As far as this witness can remember, Vergara said that in the works of Erasmus which he had read, he knew of no errors. This witness recalls that among other errors of Erasmus, he spoke of how Erasmus insisted on casting doubt on confession as a divine institution of our Redeemer and how in his works Erasmus kept demanding to be shown that it was, to which this witness replied that since the Church had decided this question in the affirmative, it was wrong to raise doubts about it and to insist in public writings that he wanted proof of it. He remembers that Vergara replied that Erasmus did not deny confession; (what Erasmus said was) that if it had been decided that confession was of divine law, he would like to know about it. This witness replied that it was so decided in the Council of Constance and in other councils ... and the said Doctor Vergara swore that it had not been so decided in the Council of Constance. |
178 JOHN E. LONGHURST sion was of divine law and the contrary view, held by a Doctor (Pedro) de Osma, had been condemned. (19) Doctor Vergara then agreed with this witness, being persuaded (that this was correct), and asked how it was that Erasmus said what he did if it had been determined (to the contrary) in the Council of Constance. The witness replied that he believed Erasmus had not seen (the statement to this effect issued by the Council of Constance). 19. The opinion that sacramental confession was not of divine law was widely held both by Erasmus and by his Spanish admirers. The Inquisition, in its trials of Erasmists, regularly treated this view as a condemned heretical proposition. In the above instance, witness Pedro Ortiz, a theologian of considerable repute, lends the weight of his authority to the Inquisition's position. There is no doubt that the Inquisition accepted Ortiz' conclusions. Inserted in the Vergara trial (between folios 188v and 189r) is a brief unsigned memorandum, dated November 4, 1530, the date of Ortiz' testimony, which reads: "It is in the Council of Constance and the determination of the universal Church, which determination was given in Alcala by Archbishop (of Toledo) Alonso Carrillo, that confession is de derecho divino, and that this was afterward confirmed by the pope and the contrary view condemned as error." If this is true, then it seems strange that a man of learning like Erasmus, or Vergara, would insist that such was not the case. The explanation lies in the fact that Erasmus and his Spanish friends were technically correct. Pedro de Osma, a professor at Salamanca, was required by Archbishop Carrillo to abjure a number of propositions about confession in 1479. Among these propositions was one which held that confession is not of divine law. The following year (1480) Pope Sixtus IV issued a bull approving of the decision against Osma. It seems very likely that Pedro Ortiz, who was himself a professor at Salamanca, learned of this episode during his association with the university. This bull of Sixtus IV was not published until 1534, four years after the above testimony of Pedro Ortiz, when it appeared in the first edition of Alfonso de Castro's Adversus omnes haereses. In the bull, one finds that Sixtus IV did approve of the condemnation of the views of Pedro de Osma, including the proposition that confession was not of divine law. However, in speaking of the Council of Constance and its condemnation of heretical propositions of John Huss regarding confession, Sixtus IV cites only that council's condemnation of Huss' (and Osma's) view that contrition alone suffices in the sacrament of penance. We know that this was no oversight on the part of Sixtus IV. The view that confession was not of divine law had never been officially declared heretical at the time of Pedro Ortiz' testimony. It was obviously a controversial matter, but the controversy was not settled until the Council of Trent (Session 14, chapter 5) officially ruled that confession is of divine law. Alfonso de Castro, Adversus omnes haereses, Paris, 1534, fols. 80r-81r; Catholic Encyclopedia, 16 vols., New York, 1913, "Penance"; Enciclopedia universal ilustrada europeo-americana, 70 vols. in 72, Barcelona, 1907-1930, "Confesion"; Henry C. Lea, A History of the Inquisition of Spain, New York, 1922, vol. III, p. 412; Marcelino Menendez y Pelayo, Historia de los heterodoxos espanoles, Santander, 1947, vol. II, p. 388. |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 179 This witness does not remember any further discussion on this point, except that it distressed this witness to see the said Doctor Vergara so friendly to the doctrine of Erasmus, because this witness knew and knows that Erasmus' doctrine is shot through with dangerous errors against the traditions of the Church and contrary to some things which of a certainty must be believed, and this witness fears that such errors might be followed by men who find them in such works, unless they are letrados who can detect such errors and avoid them, or unless such errors are previously noted and removed from his works. |
180 JOHN K LONGHURST by putting the other work first; however, unless it is a work of such perfection and unless there is not enough time left for prayer, then he is obligated to pray and if he does not, he is committing a mortal sin. |
LUTHER'S GHOST IN SPAIN 181 permitting abuses. |